majorhan
08-05-06, 12:52 AM
911 Conspiracy Theorists Vindicated
Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006
Michel Chossudovsky
Recent revelations by members of the 911 Commission (quoted in the Washington Post, 2 August 2006) have farreaching implications.
They confirm that the Pentagon was involved in criminal wrongdoing by deliberately distorting and/or withholding information concerning the September 2001 attacks:
Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagons initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate. (WP, 2 August 2006)
These revelations uphold what has been documented regarding 911 in several carefully researched studies, which the mainstream Media continues to identify as Conspiracy theories
It would appear that the 911 Conspiracy Theorists have at last been vindicated. The information now released and yet to come is that the Pentagon was involved in acts of coverup at the highest levels of the military hierarchy.
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission, hoping to hide the bungled response to the hijackings, these sources said.” (Ibid)
If this were known to the 911 Commission, why was it withheld?
More generally, why was the contradictory evidence presented by the Pentagon, the White House and the CIA taken at face value. Why did the 911 Commission uphold the lies and falsehoods in its authoritative Report?
Damage control
The Commission was not misled. The Commission deliberately and consciously distorted the facts regarding 911. A large part of the 911 narrative as presented in its report is fabricated.
The Pentagons top brass (including senior NORAD officials) were involved in acts of perjury with a view to misleading public opinion. If the Commission doubted the veracity of the information presented, why did it replicate the lies and falsehoods in its report.
These recent revelations have all the appearances of “damage control they consist in admitting that the Pentagon withheld information, without questioning the broader findings of the 911 Commission Report:
I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described,John Farmer, a former New Jersey attorney general who led the staff inquiry into events on Sept. 11, said in a recent interview.The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. . . . This is not spin. This is not true (Ibid).
read more (http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/911-conspiracy-theorists-vindicated)
Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006
Michel Chossudovsky
Recent revelations by members of the 911 Commission (quoted in the Washington Post, 2 August 2006) have farreaching implications.
They confirm that the Pentagon was involved in criminal wrongdoing by deliberately distorting and/or withholding information concerning the September 2001 attacks:
Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagons initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate. (WP, 2 August 2006)
These revelations uphold what has been documented regarding 911 in several carefully researched studies, which the mainstream Media continues to identify as Conspiracy theories
It would appear that the 911 Conspiracy Theorists have at last been vindicated. The information now released and yet to come is that the Pentagon was involved in acts of coverup at the highest levels of the military hierarchy.
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission, hoping to hide the bungled response to the hijackings, these sources said.” (Ibid)
If this were known to the 911 Commission, why was it withheld?
More generally, why was the contradictory evidence presented by the Pentagon, the White House and the CIA taken at face value. Why did the 911 Commission uphold the lies and falsehoods in its authoritative Report?
Damage control
The Commission was not misled. The Commission deliberately and consciously distorted the facts regarding 911. A large part of the 911 narrative as presented in its report is fabricated.
The Pentagons top brass (including senior NORAD officials) were involved in acts of perjury with a view to misleading public opinion. If the Commission doubted the veracity of the information presented, why did it replicate the lies and falsehoods in its report.
These recent revelations have all the appearances of “damage control they consist in admitting that the Pentagon withheld information, without questioning the broader findings of the 911 Commission Report:
I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described,John Farmer, a former New Jersey attorney general who led the staff inquiry into events on Sept. 11, said in a recent interview.The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. . . . This is not spin. This is not true (Ibid).
read more (http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/911-conspiracy-theorists-vindicated)