Just Click on logo to return to full home page

 

Your Ad Here

More UK children live in poverty

Pooka
03-27-07, 03:56 PM
The number of children living in relative poverty in the UK rose by 200,000 last year, official figures have revealed.

The first increase in nearly a decade casts doubt on the government's target of halving child poverty by 2010.

In 2005-6, 3.8m children were in relative poverty - defined as homes on less than 60% of average income net of housing costs.

Children's charity Barnardo's chief called the figures "a moral disgrace".

With housing costs not taken into account, the number of children living below the relative poverty line was 2.8 million.

The figures represent an increase from 3.6 million and 2.7 million respectively in the previous year.

Since 1998/99, 600,000 children have been lifted out of relative poverty.

But to reach their stated targets, ministers must now help lift a further 1.1 million children above the poverty line by 2010 - or 1.6 million after housing costs are included.

'Depressing'

"This is a moral disgrace. In 1999, we were all excited by the Government's determination to eradicate child poverty and, on the way, to halve it by 2010," said Barnardo's chief executive Martin Narey.

"It is now clear that what they meant was that they intended, not to halve child poverty by 2010, but to reduce it a bit."

Shadow chancellor George Osborne labelled the figures "depressing" and called for a "new approach" to tackle poverty.

"Today's depressing figures show that poverty is increasing, inequality is rising, and the incomes of the poorest fifth are in decline," he said.

He called for an approach "based on social responsibility so that, alongside financial support through tax credits, it can focus on tackling broken communities, poor skills and family breakdown".

'New Deal'

The Government said rise in the number of self-employed people falling below the line contributed significantly to this year's rise.

It hopes the launch of a new £150m child poverty strategy, which includes a programme to get parents into employment, will help the government hit its target.

Under the "New Deal for Families", for the first time all applicants at Job Centres will be asked whether or not they have children.

The government says advisers can then consider the applicant's need for help with looking after their family.

In last week's Budget, Chancellor Gordon Brown announced increases in benefits and tax credits aimed at lifting more than 200,000 children out of poverty.

Budget announcements

Save the Children's UK director Colette Marshall said: "This vital target is slipping dangerously out of reach.

"It is only too clear that Gordon Brown's Budget announcements last week will not be enough to get the government back on track.

"We must now see a sense of urgency from the government to make the target achievable."

Source (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6497981.stm)

philemmons
03-27-07, 04:15 PM
Within the USA, our government redefines its census terms to meet its goal... ie unemployment mow includes military reserve, part time employees, and volunteer workers...

jod
03-27-07, 04:31 PM
In the UK we just increase the taxation rate until something gives

mAVERICK1
03-28-07, 10:27 AM
Those are sobering stats. But it all depends on how you interpret poverty. When I was a kid I had 3 brothers and 2 sisters. My Dad was the sole income earner. I honestly don't know how they did it. To give us 3 meals a day, clothe us and send us to school. Nowadays (even taking into account the relativity of wage increases) my income is at least 5 times what my dad earned and he made it stretch for a wife and 6 kids. I can't even make mine last for myself. Now that's not sad. It's pathetic :( If I didn't waste money on crap I don't need I'd probably be doing quite well in the savings department. My only saving grace is that I donate to three annual charities a few times a year and one other I donate to on a weekly basis. So I'm not totally useless to society!

Pooka
03-28-07, 03:47 PM
To give us 3 meals a day...

LUXURY!!!

:rotflmao:

:fly:

mAVERICK1
03-29-07, 12:09 AM
My point exactly! Even then I knew we were lucky when I was a kid. That's why I'm so disgusted with the wasted spending I have today.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum