Jon
03-23-07, 09:30 PM
WTC 1 and 2 Were To Be "Decomissioned" by 2007 Per: EPA for Safety Reasons - "Bridgeways Project
Here is an affadavit from a man namd Thomas Scott Gordon who claims to have been a WTC photographer and had inadvertently sat in on a meeting discussing the "Decommissioning" of WTC 1 and 2.
Sorry if this has a thread already, search did not find it.
It would be easy to prove or disprove his story had the EPA not closed all of their research libraries last year. I do believe I still have a copy of some of this information in the cache on my home PC... I will check tonight.
Please read the provided affidavit... Fantasy or reality? You help me decide. He does not claim to know HOW the buildings were brought down... only why.
Here is his affidavit, for the sake of time start with part 2:
http://www.redlineav.com/tsg.deposition.contd.2.html
Here is part one:
http://www.redlineav.com/tsg.deposition.1.html
http://www.redlineav.com/graphics/NIST.typical.fissure.jpg
:bonghit:
Here is an affadavit from a man namd Thomas Scott Gordon who claims to have been a WTC photographer and had inadvertently sat in on a meeting discussing the "Decommissioning" of WTC 1 and 2.
Sorry if this has a thread already, search did not find it.
It would be easy to prove or disprove his story had the EPA not closed all of their research libraries last year. I do believe I still have a copy of some of this information in the cache on my home PC... I will check tonight.
Please read the provided affidavit... Fantasy or reality? You help me decide. He does not claim to know HOW the buildings were brought down... only why.
Here is his affidavit, for the sake of time start with part 2:
http://www.redlineav.com/tsg.deposition.contd.2.html
Here is part one:
http://www.redlineav.com/tsg.deposition.1.html
http://www.redlineav.com/graphics/NIST.typical.fissure.jpg
:bonghit: